WHO’S THE AUTHORITY: WINE SPECTATOR OR WINE ADVOCATE? Why does a 2001 Harlan Estate Cabernet get a 100 from Wine Advocates Robert Parker but a 96 from Wine Spectator? It’s all in the tasting methods and who performs the tests. Parker does Wine Advocate’s tastings in peer-group, single-blind conditions, meaning that nothing about the wine is known prior to testing, and wines are compared to one another. Wine Spectators eight editors are experts in different regions. Each editor generally performs blind tastings for wines in his or her region. Both methods ensure consistency and unbiased ratings, while allowing for different scores based on the critic’s tasting experience and preferences. Since Robert Parker has more experience, his ratings generally determine the wine’s value; however, Wine Spectator is regarded as the authority of wine publications. It is not as if you can “substitute” other bottles for 100 point-rated wines, but if you want similar taste or fl avor profi les in wines that you can actually afford to drink – even if only on special occasions – allow me to make a few recommendations of wines that I feel represent incredible value.
|